Legal Opinion

Cox v. Enloe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1937No. Civil No. 3835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Lester T. Cox and A. B. Cox, a partnership doing business under the firm name and style of W. H. Cox & Sons, hereinafter called defend ants, have appealed from a judgment in favor of H. H. Enloe and Pocohontas Enloe, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs. The case arose out of an automobile collision between a truck belonging to defendants and driven by E. M. Ewing and a passenger car driven by H. H. Enloe in which his wife was riding at the time of the accident. There is singularly little dispute in regard to the facts of the case, and we state them as follows:

Defendants were engaged in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Otero v. Soto Ex Rel. GonzalesArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Campbell v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Peters v. Pima Mercantile Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Schneider v. McAleerArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. RubaizArizona Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Strauss v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Self v. HansonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. Marquardt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. McCauley v. StewardArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Higginbotham v. AN MOTORS OF SCOTTSDALECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API