Legal Opinion

Automatic Voting MacHine Corp. v. Daley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1951No. 31916PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice FueTon

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Cook County in favor of the Director of the Department of Revenue of the State of Illinois, hereinafter referred to as defendant, whereby the court declared that the Automatic Voting Machine Corporation, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, is, and has been at the time of each and every sale of voting machines made by it to the election commission of the city of Chicago, engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property at retail in the State of Illinois; that the company is under a duty to apply for and receive a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Booz v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mahon v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. AmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. People ex rel. AllenIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hartney Fuel Oil Company v. HamerIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. TierneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hassett Storage Warehouse, Inc. v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Waukegan Community Unit School District No. 60 v. City of WaukeganIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Chemed Corp. v. State of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API