Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Horne

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1927No. 5969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

This was an action in the statutory form for recovery of land. A verdict was rendered for the plaintiif, and the defendant excepted to the refusal of a new trial. Held:

1. An exception to “the entire charge of the court,” on the ground that it “is erroneous and does not clearly and distinctly set out all of the issues in the case at bar, and because the court failed to charge the entire law of the defendant’s contentions,” is insufficient to raise any question for decision, unless the entire charge of the court is erroneous, which does not seem to have been true of the charge in the instant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mechanics' & Traders' Bank v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  2. Henley v. BrockmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Whatley v. Doe ex dem. NewsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  4. Gate City Gas-Light Co. v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. AdcockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Tanner v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. McGinley v. GoetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  4. Stamps v. TisingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API