Stamps v. Tisinger

Tisinger, as administrator of the estate of Thomas Stamps, brought suit to cancel a deed made by his intestate to Z. T. Stamps et al., on the ground that the intestate, at the time of executing the deed, was mentally incapable of making a valid deed; that the deed was void because of undue influence exercised by the grantees, and because of fraud. The court submitted three questions to the jury, which were, together with the answers made by the jury, as follows: “1. Should the deed in question from Thomas Stamps to Z. T. Stamps and Josie Stamps be set aside on the ground of lack of mental…