Legal Opinion
United States v. Edward Robert Traynor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1993No. 92-30079PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Chief Judge:
Following his conditional guilty plea to manufacturing marijuana plants in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, Traynor appeals the district court’s denial of his motions to dismiss the indictment and to suppress evidence. Traynor also challenges his sentence. The district court exercised jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231. Traynor’s plea agreement expressly reserved his right to appeal. We thus have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
I
On November 6, 1990, Spokane County Sheriff’s deputies Walker and Madsen…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Michael JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- New Hampshire Hemp Council, Inc. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Kevin C. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Joe Morgan v. Bill Woessner, and Clay Searle Los Angeles City, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Arthur FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.