Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 69-2717PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HAROLD K. WOOD, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment by third-party defendant Paulsboro Chemical Company, a New Jersey corporation. Plaintiff, an employee of Paulsboro, is a resident of New Jersey.1

On November 21, 1967, during the course of his employment with Paulsboro, plaintiff was injured while loading a truck on the premises of defendant Atlantic Richfield Company in Philadelphia. As a result of the accident, plaintiff became entitled to benefits under the New Jersey Compensation Act and was paid a total of $2,118.57 by Paulsboro’s Workmen’s Compensation…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Brown v. DickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roy v. Star Chopper Co., Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Pust v. Union Supply Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API