State v. Jagger
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Mathew Jagger appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the charge of escape of a sexually violent predator under RCW 9A.76.115. He argues that the statute unconstitutionally criminalizes escape from a civil facility and violates both the double jeopardy clause and the equal protection guaranties of the *528Washington and United States constitutions. We disagree and affirm.
Houghton, J.
*528FACTS
¶2 On March 15, 2006, the State committed Jagger to the McNeil Island Special Commitment Center (SCC) after a jury found him to be a sexually violent predator (SVP). On July 21, officials at…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. ManussierWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CoriaWashington Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SchernerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009