Legal Opinion

Polo Ranch Company v. City of Cheyenne

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1998No. 96-316PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Chief Justice.

This case arises out of a 1955 Drilling and Water Use Agreement (Agreement) entered into between the predecessors in interest of appellant, Polo Ranch Company (“Polo Ranch” or “Ranch”), and the City of Cheyenne, Board of Public Utilities (City). For many years, the parties operated under the Agreement without problems, but in the 1970s conflicts began to surface regarding Polo Ranch’s contractual entitlement to water. After several years of escalating disputes, litigation ensued, involving declaratory judgment claims, contract claims and extra-contractual claims, all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Examination Management Services, Inc. v. KirschbaumWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Scherer Construction, LLC v. Hedquist Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Life Care Centers of America, Inc. v. DexterWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Alexander v. MedunaWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Double Eagle Petroleum & Mining Corporation v. Questar Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wadi Petroleum, Inc. v. Ultra Resources, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API