Legal Opinion

Bigelow ex rel. Bigelow v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8018SC53Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The directed verdicts in favor of the defendants should be affirmed because the plaintiffs’ failure to have a lighted headlamp as required by law constitutes contributory negligence as a matter of law.

N.C.G.S. 20-129(c) provides:

Headlamps on Motorcycles. — Every motorcycle shall be equipped with at least one and not more than two headlamps which shall comply with the requirements and limitations set forth in G.S. 20-131 or 20-132. The headlamps on a motorcycle shall be lighted at all times while the motorcycle is in operation on highways or public vehicular areas.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API