Legal Opinion

Flatow v. Ingalls

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 2010No. 49A02-0910-CV-994PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Case Summary and Issue

Gail Flatow and Flatow Comer LLP {collectively, the "Flatow Defendants") appeal the trial court's denial of their motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit brought against them by Dwane Ingalls for legal malpractice. The Flatow Defendants raise three issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as one: whether the trial court properly denied the Flatow Defendants' motion for summary judgment. Concluding there are no genuine issues of material fact and the Flatow Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we reverse and remand.

Fact…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. University of Southern Indiana Foundation v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Tibbs v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elizabeth Roumbos v. Samuel G. Vazanellis & Thiros and Stracci, PCIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Price v. KuchaesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Price Waicukauski & Riley, LLC v. MurrayDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
  4. National Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. ALERDING CASTOR HEWITT LLP v. FLETCHERDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API