Legal Opinion

Price Waicukauski & Riley, LLC v. Murray

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided September 18, 2014No. Cause No. 1:10-cv-1065-WTL-TABPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE, District Judge.

Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for,summary judgment (dkt. nos. 99, 118). The motions are fully briefed, and the Court rules as follows.

*813I. STANDARD

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(a) provides that summary judgment is appropriate “if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” In ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the admissible evidence presented by the non-moving party must be believed and all…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Zerante v. DeLucaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Pfiffner v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Willard L. Hemsworth, II v. quotesmith.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Donna Hendricks-Robinson, Penny Moore, Teresa Westlake v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CRIT Corp. v. WilkinsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. CRIT Corp. and Peoplelink, LLC v. William J. Wilkinson, Hoosier Investments, LLC, Peter G. Trybula, and Barnes & Thornburg LLPIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Lisnek v. Law Office of Marco A. MolinaDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Shah v. RodinoDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API