DeSylva v. Ballentine
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
This action was brought by the father of an illegitimate child for a determination of the rights and duties of the respective parties under section 196a 1 of the Civil Code and under a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant Marie Ballentine, the child’s mother.
In his complaint as amended plaintiff alleges, on information and belief, that he is the father of defendant Stephen William Ballentine; he is willing and able to give and has given the infant suitable support; defendant Marie Ballentine is the mother of the infant; on October 30, 1945, plaintiff and Marie Ballentine…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Kircher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brunzell v. Golden Gate National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Everett v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Everett v. EverettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Crevolin v. CrevolinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Guay v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.