Legal Opinion

Winchester Homes, Incorporated v. Osmose Wood Preserving, Incorporated Applied Research Group, Incorporated Chesapeake Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1994No. 93-1712PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DONALD RUSSELL and Judge KEELEY joined.

OPINION

WIDENER, Circuit Judge:

Winchester Homes, Inc. (Winchester) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its suit against Osmose Wood Preserving Company, Inc. (Osmose), Applied Research Group, Inc. (ARGI), and Chesapeake Corporation (Chesapeake) (cumulatively, the defendants). The district court dismissed the case on the grounds that Winchester’s prior suit against the defendants in the Circuit Court of Fair-fax County, Virginia, supplied the law of the case as…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Catawba Indian Tribe of South Carolina v. State of S.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  5. Morrison v. BestlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Antisdel v. AshbySupreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  2. Dalloul v. AgbeySupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  3. In Re FAC Realty Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. Lewin v. CookeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  5. JB Intern., Inc. v. Mega Flight, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API