Legal Opinion

Gallegos v. Freeman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 7, 2013No. 67628-8-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDwyer, J.

¶1 — Qualified immunity shields a government official from liability for money damages in a lawsuit asserting the violation of a federal civil right unless the plaintiff pleads facts demonstrating that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct. A right is “clearly established” only where existing precedent has resolved the statutory or constitutional question beyond debate — the contours of the right must be sufficiently clear that every reasonable official in the circumstances presented would have understood…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steven Petersen v. Lewis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Johnson v. Clark County SheriffDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
  3. Michael Segaline v. State Of Wa, Dept. Of L & ICourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  4. Reed v. HammondDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
  5. Sara L. Lacy, App/cross-resp v. Snohomish County, Resp/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API