Legal Opinion

Loftus v. Miners Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1932No. Appeal, 13PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is an action of assumpsit to recover the sum of $2,646.40 with interest, being the amount of money on deposit in defendant bank to the credit of Anton Marx at the time of his death. The action was instituted by Barbara Marx, executrix of decedent, and sole legatee under his will, but she having died since the opinion of the court below was filed, the administrator d. b. n., c.t.a. is plaintiff in this appeal.

The defense to payment of the sum in question was the transfer of the amount involved to the credit of John A. Marx, son of testator, by a check, alleged to have been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Reist v. WoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Craighead v. McLoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Barnard v. KellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  5. Swank v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marko v. MendelowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Williams v. Southern Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Iwankow v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Girard Trust Co. v. George v. Cresson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Miller Election Contest CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API