Parkdale Fuel Co. v. Taylor
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from Boulder District Court. Hon. Harry P. Gamble, Judge.
1DissentHurlbut, J.
My dissent to the majority opinion is based solely upon a conviction that it is in direct conflict with the prior decisions of our Supreme Court.
The interrogatory propounded to the juror upon his voir dire, and upon which the validity of the judgment hinges, was as follows:
“Q. Do you know Mr. Felker or Mr. Dickinson, who represent the Ocean Insurance Company in this case?”
The question was promptly objected tó, but the objection was not explicitly sustained by the court. The -form of the .interrogatory in no way tended to elicit from the juror any information or knowledge which might be a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hollis v. United States Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Manigold v. Black River Traction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Vindicator Consolidated Gold Mining Co. v. FirstbrookSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Sawyer v. J. M. Arnold Shoe Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
- Coe v. Van WhySupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.