LaCroix v. Senecal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBkown, C. J.
The plaintiff, a niece of the testatrix, who was left nothing under her aunt’s will and cod*313icil, brought this action for a declaratory judgment as heir and next of Mn. She asked in effect for a decree that one-half of the residuary estate of the testatrix is intestate and that she, as heir, is entitled to that one-half interest. The plaintiff’s claim of intestacy is predicated upon the fact that one of the three subscribing witnesses of the codicil was the husband of the defendant Aurea Seneeal, to whom one-half of the residue was given by the express terms of both instruments. The court held…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McIntyre v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sanderson v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Security Co. v. SnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- In re the Probate of the Will of MacomberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Churchill v. AllessioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. ColesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- King v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Arrowsmith v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
- Kroll v. NehmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998