Legal Opinion

Kroll v. Nehmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1998No. 53, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

Margaret Binco died on December 19, 1994, leaving four wills—one dated July 24, 1980, a second dated April 12, 1985, a third dated June 28, 1990, and a fourth dated October 27, 1994. We are concerned here only with the second will—the 1985 will.

The 1980 will, it appears, had been altered, and, although it was at one time offered for probate, no one now contends that it has any validity. When Ms. Binco drew the 1990 will, she wrote on the back of her 1985 will “VOID—NEW WILL DRAWN UP 6-28-90.” 1 The 1990 and 1994 wills, all parties agree, are ineffective because they lack the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Cuneo v. MondaniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Blackford v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Chambers v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Watson v. LandvatterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wehrheim v. GOLDEN POND ASSISTED LIVINGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Oliver v. HaysCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. State v. PalmNevada Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API