Legal Opinion
Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v. City of Holland
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 1999No. Docket 208543PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendant city of Holland appeals as of right a circuit court judgment declaring subsections 39-348(g) and 39-350(b) of Holland City Ordinance No. 1100 invalid as violative of the Michigan Home Rule City Act, MCL 117.1 et seq.) MSA 5.2071 et seq., and the Michigan zoning enabling act, MCL 125.581 et seq.) MSA 5.2931 et seq. The lower court’s judgment also epjoined defendant city from enforcing those two subsections of the ordinance regarding billboards and also declared the offending portions severable, thereby not affecting the validity of the remainder of the ordinance. Plaintiff Adams…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Detroit v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Paragon Properties Co. v. City of NoviMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adams Outdoor Advertising, Inc v. City of HollandMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Houdek v. Centerville TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Norman Corp. v. City of East TawasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Outdoor System, Inc. v. City of ClawsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.