Legal Opinion

In Re DL

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 22, 1995No. 94-218Published

1Opinion of the Court

669 A.2d 1172 (1995)

In re D.L.

No. 94-218.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

September 22, 1995.

Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, and David Tartter, Assistant Attorney General, Montpelier, for State.

David J. Mullett of Cheney, Brock, Saudek & Mullett, P.C., Montpelier, for appellee M.R.

Robert A. Sheftman, Montpelier, for appellee D.H.(1).

Before ALLEN, C.J., and GIBSON, DOOLEY, MORSE and JOHNSON, JJ.

DOOLEY, Justice.

The State of Vermont appeals an order of the Washington District Court quashing subpoenas issued in connection with an inquest proceeding pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 5131. The district court…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Carrick v. LockeWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API