Legal Opinion

Pam R. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2008No. S-12742PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A grandmother appeals from a trial court determination that she is not the "Indian custodian" of her three grandchildren under the Indian Child Welfare Act. The trial court found that contrary to her urgings, the grandmother was not an Indian custodian by tribal custom or by transfer of physical custody of the children; she argues that the court's findings are erroneous. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court's findings, and we therefore affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts 1

Mark and Sally have three sons, Max (born in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Martin N. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. D.J. v. P.C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bennett v. BennettAlaska Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris v. GovernaleAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. McLaren v. McLarenAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Ted W. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In re A.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. J. M. v. S. C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API