Legal Opinion
Clapp v. Hadley
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1895No. 17,168PublishedCited by 6 opinions
From the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.
The appellee executed two mortgages of a tract of land in Noble county, one in the jmar 1871 and the other in the year 1886. These mortgages were held by the appellant, one as mortgagee and the other as assignee, when, on the 23d day of May, 1893, he procured separate decrees foreclosing them. Neither decree, so far as appellant’s allegations disclose, made any reference to the other or any order concerning the distribution of the surplus arising from sales upon such decrees.
On the 24th day of June, 1893, the appellant purchased under the junior mortgage decree for the full *29amount- of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Koons v. MellettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Sherwood v. City of LafayetteIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hart v. WingartIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Purviance v. EmleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Taylor v. McGrewIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
- Luken v. FickleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- State ex rel. Hadley v. ClappIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- White v. ShirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Susan J. Sanders v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, As Trustee, For ABS Loan Trust VIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.