Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. Division 268
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
Decided December 26, 1949No. 609819PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ARTL, J.
The plaintiff in this action, is the city of Cleveland, a municipal corporation, by the individuals constituting the Transit Board of the city of Cleveland.
The plaintiff is a division of the municipality of the city of Cleveland. The Transit System is a publicly owned institu*174tion, owned by the people of the city of Cleveland.
It is to be noted that as a matter of law there is a legal limitation upon the power of the Transit Board in this instance, or of any public Board, to deal with, that is, to contract with a labor organization. The employees in the Transit System must…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- City of Springfield v. ClouseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Mugford v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Miami Water Works Local No. 654 v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Nutter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bennett v. GravelleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
- Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Lamphere Schools v. Lamphere Federation of TeachersMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- City of Detroit v. Division 26 of the Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.