Legal Opinion
Richter v. Cann
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided October 16, 1940No. 13516PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
No transcript of the record accompanies the bill of exceptions, it being expressly stated therein that no part of the record other than that appearing in the bill of exceptions is material to a clear understanding of the errors complained of. None of the pleadings are here. The final judgment only is before us. The burden is on the party alleging that a judgment is erroneous to show it affirmatively by the record. Simpson v. McBride, 78 Ga. 297; Grier v. Cross, 79 Ga. 435 (6 S. E. 14); Gairdner v. Tate, 121 Ga. 253 (48 S. E. 907); Farmers Protective Fire Ins. Co. v. Portrum,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- First National Bank v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Crittenden v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Babb v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Simpson v. McBrideSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Irwin v. ArrendaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Campbell v. PowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Stripling v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.