Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Roberto

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 3, 2011No. SC09-1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Jaime Roberto be found guilty of professional misconduct and placed on probation for a period of one year. The Florida Bar petitions the Court for review of the report, taking issue with the referee’s failure to find . Roberto in violation of Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.7(a) (Representing Adverse Interests), as well as the referee’s recommended sanction. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.

The disciplinary case against Jaime Roberto arises from alleged ethical violations that occurred during his…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Kelsay Dayon PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Florida Bar v. DohertySupreme Court of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API