Florida Bar v. Roberto
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending that Respondent Jaime Roberto be found guilty of professional misconduct and placed on probation for a period of one year. The Florida Bar petitions the Court for review of the report, taking issue with the referee’s failure to find . Roberto in violation of Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-1.7(a) (Representing Adverse Interests), as well as the referee’s recommended sanction. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const.
The disciplinary case against Jaime Roberto arises from alleged ethical violations that occurred during his…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- The Florida Bar v. GermainSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. Kelsay Dayon PattersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
- Florida Bar v. DohertySupreme Court of Florida · 2012