Legal Opinion

Amato v. General Motors Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1982No. 39645PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, P. J.

The general issue in this appeal is the legal propriety of a class certified for class action by the trial court pursuant to Civ. R. 23.

Paul Amato is plaintiff-appellee (“ap-pellee”) and General Motors Corp. is defendant-appellant (“appellant”).

For reasons adduced below the certification is provisionally approved and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

I

The facts necessary to the disposition of this case are principally procedural. They are summarized in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Ohio which, on motion to certify, reversed this court’s action dismissing the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  2. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Amato v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gilmore v. General Motors Corp.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1973

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  2. Sikes v. Teleline, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Marrone v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Delahunt v. Cytodyne TechnologiesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API