Legal Opinion
Pac-Tec, Inc. v. Amerace Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 9, 1990No. 89-1329, 89-1692PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Pac-Tec, Inc. (Pac-Tec) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, No. 86CV73873DT (DeMascio, J.), that 13 claims of Amerace Corporation’s (Amerace) patent 4,155,666 (’666) and 23 claims of Amerace’s patent 4,195,945 (’945) were infringed and not invalid. Pac-Tec further appeals from an order denying its motion for recusal. Amerace seeks sanctions against Pac-Tec pursuant to Rule 38, Fed. R.App.P. We affirm the judgment and order and impose a sanction on Pac-Tec and its counsel.
I. BACKGROUND
A. The Patents and Accused…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Diana R. Beard, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K., Tokyo v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Octocom Systems, Inc. v. Houston Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Preseault V. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Walter G. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Romala Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.