Legal Opinion
Shoultz v. Derrick
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 22, 2019No. 3:18-cv-01445-HZPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERNÁNDEZ, District Judge:
*1123Plaintiffs Gary Rodney Shoultz and Judy Ann Shoultz (collectively, "Plaintiffs") allege that Defendants Patrick Lee Derrick, Katherine Kinslow, Judith E. Lucke, and Samuel Stocks-Ladd (collectively, "Defendants") have conspired and engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), (d). According to Plaintiffs, Defendants violated RICO by forming an enterprise, on a property adjacent to where Plaintiffs live, for the purpose of producing and distributing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Italian American Defense League v. City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Momtazi Family, LLC v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019