Legal Opinion

State v. Lord

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 15, 1983PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VIOLETTE, Justice.

Randolph R. Lord and Richard D. Kim-ball appeal the denial of their Motions for New Trial in Superior Court, Oxford County. The defendants, indicted separately but tried together, were convicted by a jury for the 1979 murder of Prank Carkin. They appealed and we affirmed their convictions in State v. Kimball, 424 A.2d 684 (Me.1981). We now affirm the Superior Court denial of their new trial motions.

On January 4,1982, defendants, pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 33, filed Motions for New Trial in Superior Court, based on newly discovered evidence. Defendants sought to show that a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swenson v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. John C. Rastrom v. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. EstesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. State v. CasaleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kimball v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. State v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. State v. GroverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
  4. State v. DechaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. State v. CormierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API