Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. Saulez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1907No. 6776PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered November 30, 1906, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon a contractor’s bond.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action upon a contractor’s bond. The contractors, Saulez and Dooley, on the 30th day of April, 1903, entered into a contract with the city of Seattle for the planking of Howell street and Eastlake avenue, agreeing, among other things, that they would erect and maintain good and sufficient guards, barricades, and signals at all unsafe places at or near where the work contemplated therein was to be done, and to indemnify and save harmless the city of Seattle from all suits or actions brought against the city for or on account of any injuries sustained by any one by reason of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Tacoma Mill Co. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Peterson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Seattle v. John C. Regan & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. O'Toole v. Empire Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kibler v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Inashima v. WardallWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Miller Brewing Co. v. Capitol Distributing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API