Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Kehew

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 28, 2010No. 2008-264-AppealPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice FLAHERTY,

for the Court.

The central issue before the Court in this appeal is whether restrictive covenants, which are set forth in instruments of conveyance, and which prohibit a further subdivision of two lots in the Town of Portsmouth, remain enforceable. A Superior Court justice ruled that the restrictions no longer were enforceable because all parties had agreed to release them. The owners of one of the two lots in the subdivision appealed. We vacate the judgment.

I

Facts and Travel

In 1982, Lucille Ashley deeded lot No. 20 on Assessor’s Plat No. 64 in Portsmouth to her…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Truong v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. W.P. Associates v. Forcier, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. State v. GermaneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  4. Town of West Greenwich v. A. Cardi Realty AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Gregory v. State, Department of Mental Health, Retardation & HospitalsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medeiros v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  2. JDS So Cal, Ltd. v. Dept. of Natural ResourcesOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. David Loppi v. United Investors Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API