Steele v. Industrial Development Board of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REID, Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 23, Rules of the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Court has accepted the following question of law certified by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee:
Whether bonds which contain a “liquidity demand” provision, giving bondholders the right to collect the face value of the bonds upon giving seven (7) days notice, are bonds “maturing in six (6) months or less *347from the date of issuance” within the meaning of Tenn.Code Ann. § 67-2-101(l)(B)(i), such that the interest on the bonds is exempt from the Tennessee “Hall Income Tax” under…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SligerTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Worrall v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- Tennessee Growers, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- First Nat. Bank of Memphis v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Doty v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee Medical, Inc. v. Paula BeecherTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Memphis Light, Gas, and WaterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- Steele v. Industrial Development Board of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2000
- Anthony Perry v. Tennessee Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
- Check Printers, Inc. v. David GerreganoCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.