Legal Opinion

Hardinge v. United States Zinc Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, United States Zinc Company, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of January, 1915, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in' said clerk’s office on the same day denying defendant’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This action is brought to recover the amount of four drafts drawn by the defendant at Denver, Colo., directed to itself at 165 Broadway, Yew York city, dated February 6, 7, 8 and 10, 1912, whereby it required the payment to the order of the plaintiff of the respective sums of $653.89, $1,914.50, $1,840.89 and $727.50. The Ledge Consolidated Mining Company, a Colorado corporation, located at Silverton, San Juan County, Colo., and operating mines in that State, entered into an agreement in writing dated September 17,1910, with the defendant, United States Zinc Company, aNew York…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perley v. PerleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Simpson v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Durland v. . DurlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Lombard v. BryneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  5. Bringman v. Von GlahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hoffay v. HershensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  2. First National Bank v. DoschadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API