Legal Opinion

Hoffay v. Hershenstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherhan, J.

The action is upon a series of notes made by defendant to the order of plaintiff, under a written agreement, pursuant to which they were issued and which contains an acceleration clause.

The answer pleads, among other things, a failure of consideration. *150This issue as well as an issue of fraud likewise tendered by the answer was submitted to the jury. The trial court instructed the jury that the burden of proof of establishing both issues to the satisfaction of the jury rested upon defendant. In so far as the issue of lack of consideration is concerned, the charge Was erroneous, for the burden…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardinge v. United States Zinc Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HaysNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. Carrara v. CarraraNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bay Parkway National Bank v. ShalomNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  4. H. Rubenstein Co. v. TuckerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API