TRI County Wholesale Distributors, Inc. v. Labatt USA Operating Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
After Prohibition ended in 1933 when the Twenty-First Amendment was rati-fled, most states adopted a system for distributing alcoholic beverages that consists of three tiers: suppliers, distributors, and retailers. Suppliers manufacture or import alcoholic beverages, and they must sell their products to state-licensed distributors. Those distributors then sell the products to retailers, who sell them to consumers. While many economists are skeptical about the public benefits of this regulatory scheme, Ohio continues to operate under a three-tier system.
One feature…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Audrey M. Thompson, Florence Ain & Gregory Ain, Dorothy E. Kahan & Robert Kahan, Nana Berman & William Berman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Esber Beverage Co. v. Labatt USA Operating Co., L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ardella Patterson v. Chrysler GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Mission Beverage Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Pabst Brewing v. Frederick P. Winner, LTDCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Harris v. Sunsong Holdings, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Winner, LTD v. Pabst BrewingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.