Legal Opinion

Spielvogel v. Harkins & Maeger Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 22, 1986No. 86 Civ. 2273 (WCC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge:

Plaintiffs Carl and Barbaralee Spielvogel (“the Spielvogels”) brought this interpleader action in the New York Supreme Court, New York County, to have that court resolve competing claims to a fund they held amounting to approximately $121,000. The case was removed to this Court by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), one of the interpleaded defendants.

Simply stated, the principal claims to the fund arose as follows: The Spielvogels hired Harkins & Maeger Limited (“Harkins & Maeger”), a general contractor, to renovate their cooperative…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BosurgiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Spinello v. SpinelloNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Matter of PetersNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Reisman v. Independence Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Meltzer v. CegliaNew York Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Ralph Lauren Womenswear, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  2. Dunn & Black, P.S. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API