Legal Opinion

Greenwald v. Marquette, Houghton & Ontonagon Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1882PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Marquette. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

G-raves, O. J.

Decedent was tail brakeman under Samuel Wilks, wbo, as defendant’s engineer, ran a train for the carriage of iron ore. There were three other brakemen and a fireman. Wilks employed the men and had power to dismiss them. A train of empty cars had been taken to Ishpeming and left; and the locomotive having been turned around on the turn-table, stood on a sidetrack, and the engineer and men were near by. A number of cars loaded with ore were distant some five or six hundred feet, ready to be hauled away. The engineer observed to the men that he and the brakeman would go up and get…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evans v. MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Adams v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Core v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API