Legal Opinion

Elston v. Price

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1923No. 7 Div. 406PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The court below sustained the contest to the alleged will of Susan E. Price upon the ground the instrument offered for probate had not been attested by two witnesses, as required by our statute: Section 6172, Code 1907. Under this statute the instrument here in question to be effective as a will must have been “attested by at least two witnesses, who must subscribe their names thereto in the presence of the testator.” Unless this requisite of the statute was complied with, the instrument was ineffectual to pass real or personal property. Woodruff v. Hundley, 127 Ala. 640, 29 South. 98, 85 Am.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Keely v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Woodruff v. HundleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Riley v. RileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
  4. Blacksher Co. v. NorthrupSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Shirley v. EzellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. MasseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Massey v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Stuck v. HowardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Whitt v. ForbesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Johnston v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API