Legal Opinion

United States v. 1419 Mount Alto Road, Rome, Floyd County

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided August 12, 1993No. 1:92-cr-00287PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

This forfeiture action is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and/or Dismiss the Claim of Shawn Peek or, in the Alternative, Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. For the reasons given below, the Court denies both motions.

FACTS

Steve Peek purchased part of defendant property in 1978 and part in 1984. Steve Peek and Claimant Shawn Peek were married July 20, 1985. The Defendant property was the separate property of Steve Peek at the time of the marriage. At the time of the marriage, the residence located on the Defendant property was an unfinished…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SheftonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. RamunnoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Kelley v. McCormack (In re Mitchell)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2016
  4. United States v. 7.6 Acres of Land on Chapel RoadDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
  5. Bateman Co. v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API