Legal Opinion

Arrm v. Piper

District Court, D. Maine

Decided February 15, 2019No. Case No. 18-cv-1627 (WMW/BRT)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 38.) For the reasons addressed below, Defendant's motion is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

BACKGROUND

This case involves funding reductions to Minnesota's "waiver services" payment rates. Waiver services are services for which the federal government agrees, in limited circumstances, to waive certain statutory and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Atheists Inc v. RapertDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  2. Munt v. SchnellDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  3. Pavek v. SimonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  4. Pietsch v. Ward CountyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API