Legal Opinion

Munt v. Schnell

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2020No. 0:19-cv-01142Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA JOEL MARVIN MUNT, Case No. 19-CV-1142 (NEB/ECW) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PAUL SCHNELL, DAVID REISHUS, SHERLINDA WHEELER, BRONSON AUSTRENG, GRAHAM BESONEN, NICK DESETELLE, LINDSEY MOSSER, PARKER, and WITTER, Defendants. This matter comes before the Court on (1) Plaintiff Joel Marvin Munt’s First Amended Civil Rights Complaint (Dkt. 11 (“Amended Complaint”)); (2) Munt’s filing titled “Supplement to TRO Request” (Dkt. 20 (“TRO Supplement”)); (3) Munt’s First Motion for Expedited Temporary Restraining Order Pursuant to…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API