National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DYER, Circuit Judge:
The National Labor Relations Board, pursuant to section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 160 (e), seeks.enforcement of its order finding that J. Weingarten, Inc., violated section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a) (1), by refusing to allow a union representative to be present at an investigatory interview with an employee. We conclude that, under the facts found by the Administrative Law Judge, there was no legal requirement for a union representative to be present and accord ingly we.deny enforcement of the Board’s order.
I
The facts are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Quality Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Texaco Inc., Houston Producing Division v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ross Gear & Tool Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union, Aflcio, and Its Local Affiliate 7-507 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
3Cited by8 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbia UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Royal Development Co., Ltd., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Mt. Vernon Tanker Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Raymond D. Womer v. Robert HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.