Legal Opinion
Horne v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 20, 1956No. 36039PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.
1. A recital in a bill of exceptions that the trial court overruled a demurrer, that exception was taken to such ruling, and such ruling is assigned as error, is sufficient, when the demurrer is specified as a part of the record and discloses the objections made against the accusation. McGregor v. Third National Bank of Atlanta, 124 Ga. 557 (3) (53 S. E. 93); Toomey v. Read & Gresham, 133 Ga. 855 (1) (67 S. E. 100). The suggestion of counsel for the State that the assignment of error be not considered for failing to state the grounds of the demurrer is without merit.
Decided February 20, 1956.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Toomey v. Read & GreshamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- McGregor v. Third National Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Pierce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946
- Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Gee v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- Elrod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Julian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Peery v. Virginia Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.