Julian v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
The enumerations of error on failure to sustain a challenge to the array of the DeKalb County grand jurors who indicted the defendant are based on the following facts:
The grand jury pool at the time of this indictment had been in existence over a year. It was composed of 1,581 *594names from which jury panels were chosen by random drawing. By law (Code Ann. § 59-106 as amended by Ga. L. 1968, p. 533, and Ga. L. 1973, pp. 484, 485) the names are to be selected from "a fairly representative cross-section ... of the county from the official registered voter’s list of the county…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pierre v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- James Barber v. James PonteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Parks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Boatright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Postell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.