Legal Opinion

Ismay v. Tyler

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1959No. Civ. A. 67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPopovich, J.

In April, 1955, plaintiff, a collection agency, procured a judgment of $444.59 against defendant upon a claim assigned to it for collection by Kyle and Company. Certain executions were issued upon this judgment and were returned unsatisfied.

In November, 1957, defendant was adjudicated a bankrupt. Defendant failed to list plaintiff as a creditor in his bankruptcy schedule and no notice was mailed plaintiff of the bankruptcy proceedings. However, defendant did list Kyle and Company as a creditor in the bankruptcy schedule and a creditor’s notice was mailed to Kyle and Company.

On October 3,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Disbarment of KlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Santa Rosa Bank v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Brown v. TroppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Ray v. SchubachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garren v. SaccomannoIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Rosenthal v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API