Legal Opinion

State v. Steckler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 11, 2010No. C080741CR; A140148PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence for robbery in the second degree, ORS 164.405, challenging the amount of restitution that the trial court imposed as part of the sentence. Because we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to support the restitution imposed, we reverse and remand for resentencing, but otherwise affirm.

The relevant facts are undisputed. Defendant, wearing a ski mask and wielding what appeared to be a firearm, stole OxyContin from two Tigard Rite Aid pharmacies: one on Scholls Ferry Road and another on Main Street. Federal law requires a pharmacy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. Romero-NavarroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. CeballosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. PoolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. VenableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API