State v. Pumphrey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHadlock, J.
Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of violating a court’s stalking protective order (SPO), ORS 163.750, and the trial court entered convictions on that plea. Defendant appeals from a supplemental judgment in which the trial court imposed restitution totaling $2,674.76 for expenses incurred by the victim. On appeal, defendant contends that the state’s evidence as to five items of restitution was insufficient to establish “economic damages,” as defined in ORS 31.710(2), and therefore provided an inadequate basis for a restitution award under ORS 137.106. We affirm.
We are bound by the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. J. M. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.