Legal Opinion

State v. Venable

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 8, 2021No. A172781PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

235 Submitted September 2, affirmed December 8, 2021, petition for review denied February 24, 2022 ( 369 Or 338) STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. RYAN CHARLES VENABLE, aka Ryan Venable, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CR03774; A172781

502 P3d 250

In this criminal appeal, defendant contests the trial court’s imposition of restitution for certain ride-sharing app driver fees assessed to the victim fol- lowing defendant’s theft of the victim’s cellphone. On appeal, defendant argues that those ride-sharing app driver fees were not a reasonably foreseeable conse-…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cal. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. State v. RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. MansorOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. LobueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. AndrewsOregon Supreme Court · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. State v. KamaunuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. State v. KamaunuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API