Lesser v. Strubbe
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cukiam.
The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed for the reasons expressed in its opinion. 67 N. J. Super. 537 (1961). We add the observation, however, concerning the incongruity in Mrs. Strubbe’s position mentioned in the opinion, 67 N. J. Super., at p. 547, that, as we read the pleadings, she sought relief, as far as the mortgages *91were concerned, only with respect to that encumbering her own property in Elizabeth. No costs to any party.
2Cited by14 opinions
- Great Falls Bank v. PardoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Meadow Brook National Bank v. RecileDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- Howard v. DiolosaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- United States v. Chelsea Towers, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- First Charter National Bank v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.