Kraft v. Wolf

The plaintiff obtained "in a justice court an attachment against the wages of the defendant for a bill due plaintiff for necessaries, to-wit, for professional services as a physician. There is no dispute, of course, but that such services constitute necessaries under the law. Judgment was rendered in thq justice court in favor of plaintiff and the attachment was sustained, and the case comes here on appeal.

The facts are, substantially, that Wolf claims this property to be exempt. He claims it on two ground's: First, that under Section 5441, Revised Statutes,, he is entitled to exemption in…